Rationalizing Frequency Pollution Sciences and Academic Debates

A lot of people sense that perhaps modern human civilizations have been over bombarded with frequency pollution. Everything from Microwaves, cell phones, broadcast transmissions, radar, power lines and electronic handheld devices for entertainment have been targeted as potential problems for any human biosystem.

Problems for the heart, brain, nerves and even the cells themselves have been discussed and debated with academia, some studies funded by cell phone companies and communication corporations and others by healthcare interests.

It is that is why that an online think tank recently addressed this subject, but this entire subject is very interesting one I'd personally add; both the problems with science, funding and ego and that of the your question of frequency pollution of mobile or portable tower emissions, things like HAARP, radar, etc . And many good things come of all this of course, it is just a matter of adequate modulation and consideration of how everything is inter-related and works together.

In fact all these topics bleed jointly but science is so fractionalized by category that it makes for a real problematic issue in how modern humans and additionally society has chosen to use their brains and educate little up and coming human being children to use theirs. And thus that rule of unintended consequences occurs when linear thought migrates to work in pure categories and boxes. Which means that there is a little philosophy for you and the reason for the need for more abstract, multi-disciplinary and renaissance human thinkers. See here Yamin Ahmed Edinburgh

I do believe that increased life expectancy is the answer to this dilemma, allowing humans more time to learn more types of sciences and better inter-brain communications in real time thought transfer to help all the worlds human knowledge to work together. That is the answer really, but the excellent line between individualism and collectiveness must be observed in the human species or it cannot work.

Wow, precisely how did I get on that subject so fast? Maybe I should call Ray Kurzweil, Bill Bryson, Arthur J. Clark or Stephen Wolfram to finish off this subject for me? Or we can just move it to a different place and continue the philosophy of taking the human race to the next step and we can solve all these little factors of Earthquakes, Hurricanes, Frequency Pollution, Human Bio-system perfection and merging our best efforts in science in addition to technology. Consider all this in 2006.