Rationalizing Frequency Pollution Sciences and Academic Debates
A lot of people sense that perhaps modern human civilizations have been over bombarded with frequency pollution. Everything from Microwaves, cell phones, broadcast transmissions, radar, power lines and electronic handheld devices for entertainment have been targeted as potential problems for any human biosystem.
Problems for the heart, brain, nerves and even the cells themselves have been discussed and debated with academia, some studies funded by cell phone companies and communication corporations and others by healthcare interests.
It is that is why that an online think tank recently addressed this subject, but this entire subject is very interesting one I'd personally add; both the problems with science, funding and ego and that of the your question of frequency pollution of mobile or portable tower emissions, things like HAARP, radar, etc . And many good things come of all this of course, it is just a matter of adequate modulation and consideration of how everything is inter-related and works together.
In fact all these topics bleed jointly but science is so fractionalized by category that it makes for a real problematic issue in how modern humans and additionally society has chosen to use their brains and educate little up and coming human being children to use theirs. And thus that rule of unintended consequences occurs when linear thought migrates to work in pure categories and boxes. Which means that there is a little philosophy for you and the reason for the need for more abstract, multi-disciplinary and renaissance human thinkers. See here Yamin Ahmed Edinburgh
I do believe that increased life expectancy is the answer to this dilemma, allowing humans more time to learn more types of sciences and better inter-brain communications in real time thought transfer to help all the worlds human knowledge to work together. That is the answer really, but the excellent line between individualism and collectiveness must be observed in the human species or it cannot work.
Wow, precisely how did I get on that subject so fast? Maybe I should call Ray Kurzweil, Bill Bryson, Arthur J. Clark or Stephen Wolfram to finish off this subject for me? Or we can just move it to a different place and continue the philosophy of taking the human race to the next step and we can solve all these little factors of Earthquakes, Hurricanes, Frequency Pollution, Human Bio-system perfection and merging our best efforts in science in addition to technology. Consider all this in 2006.
Separation of Science and Religion
That expansion of human knowledge took place largely through the interaction of human beings with nature, fellow humans and energies of history. In this process, the existential condition of human beings, their basic needs and methods to satisfy independently played a crucial role. The human existential nature comprises both natural endowments, the biological and mental peculiarities and cultural styles and achievements.
With the emergence of imperial political organisation, there took place large-scale growth with trade, commerce, technology and industrial production. This is revealed through the history of ancient civilisations like those involving India, China, Egypt, Greece and Rome. With few exceptions, now a differentiation between the scientists and strict or priestly classes took place. The knowledge of science and technology had its uses in industry and discord. These were the foundations of new empires and they were organised in a comprehensive institutional form. At this stage of communal development, the magical practices were largely individualised, and the institutional organisation of science and religion was slowly but surely being separated. This separation was often hazy but the specialised roles necessitated functional differentiation.
With the decline in the Graeco-Roman civilisation and the rise of Christianity, the Church had emerged in Europe as the most powerful social together with political institution. It was a major setback to the process of differentiation between religious and scientific knowledge. As the religious worldview of medieval Christianity increased its influence through the church, the scope for scientific experiments and success associated with its humanistic and rational worldview declined. All knowledge was now subject to approval of religious authority available by the Church. Its Seminaries were the only institutional organisations recognised for generation and communication of knowledge. The following pattern continued for several centuries unit it was challenged by forces of renaissance and religious reformation during the fifteenth and 16th centuries.
The contributions to science by Galileo, Copernicus and Newton and the religious reforms caused by Luther and Calvin made it possible that humanistic, rational and empirical forms of knowledge could slowly be available. Luther and Calvin emphasised the role of individual over that of Church for religious salvation. Galileo and Newton offered scientific and experimental evidence instead of theological cosmology and brought the human being back into this natural scheme of universe. Slowly the nature of seminaries which were like theological schools changed. These were taken out of your control of the Church and taken over by the city councils of citizens for administration and cultivation of know-how. The modern university system on secular basis of organisation, production and communication of knowledge thus came into being. This procedure of secularisation of knowledge in the European society took several hundred years and was aided by its own community, political, cultural and economic transformation.
